I’ve been experimenting with Bear as part of my productivity setup (alongside Things and Apple Calendar), and I stumbled on a method that’s working really well for me. I’m calling it the Meta Document approach.
The problem:
-
Bear’s flexibility with tags is great, but it can also get too organic.
-
Without some structure, tags multiply and the system gets messy.
The solution:
-
I created one “Meta Document” note in Bear that lists all my core tags, grouped by domain (e.g. #journal, #projects/ProjectX, #hr, #compliance/GDPR, etc.).
-
This document is both a map and a governance tool:
-
It seeds Bear with the tags I actually want to use.
-
It gives me a master view of my system.
-
When I add/remove tags, I update this one note — Bear dynamically reshapes itself around the new structure.
-
Why it works:
-
Journals still capture everything day-to-day.
-
Projects and domains have continuity.
-
Tags stay intentional, not chaotic.
-
Over time, Bear evolves with me, but never drifts into entropy.
It’s lightweight, but it gives Bear just enough scaffolding to stay coherent long-term.
Curious — has anyone else tried something like this? How do you stop Bear from becoming tag soup?
